tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8086052983184217440.post4804483542735015087..comments2022-11-29T11:22:19.101-05:00Comments on Paul Stadig: metric_fu, rcov, and rspecpaulhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14647609048389725132noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8086052983184217440.post-53831235733863563962009-09-24T12:22:07.275-04:002009-09-24T12:22:07.275-04:00You saved my life..You saved my life..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8086052983184217440.post-3262578993583306852009-09-09T09:04:41.159-04:002009-09-09T09:04:41.159-04:00Thank you for this post. It just saved my day.Thank you for this post. It just saved my day.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13418855637014713155noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8086052983184217440.post-21129135998739227722009-07-10T21:34:08.119-04:002009-07-10T21:34:08.119-04:00It's not as obvious as you might think -- I ma...It's not as obvious as you might think -- I made the same mistake. Back in the early days of of RSpec, all you had to require was 'spec' but now you need to require 'spec/autorun'. I kept wondering why when I ran metric_fu on itself the coverage was terrible (If you just require 'spec' the specs won't run automatically when you pass them to rcov) until I figured that out.Jake Scruggshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16274380203959781950noreply@blogger.com